Paul Arden wrote: ↑Wed Nov 11, 2020 1:26 pm
Did you also measure the frequency? And yes I’ll need to migrate the CCS table over. It probably will mean doing it by hand. I haven’t had the time
I’m not sure I would call +1ERN a “noodle”
Mind you this was 25 years ago. Technology has changed a little and perceptions a lot. And fly lines are all over the place!
Cheers, Paul
Na, unfortunatly, never got much into the frequency stuff. And that would be awesome
True ERN according to Bill would be 4,5 for a rod named 4 on the blank, so more like 0,5 ERN in Bill's favor. Rods with higher AA tend to have at least a ERN +1,5 to make them not feel noodly
And yeah, technology have gotten slightly better (still have a rod from the mid 90's that is as nice as a comparable rod from the same manufacturer done today
) And yes, perceptions have changed alot more! mind you, the STS was said to be the bees knees back then, and I didn't like them back then either, thought they where tip heavy and a bit noodly....
And yes! The most important bit of kit for a flyfisher, and the industry have made sure it's all over the place and more difficult than neccessary ....
Cheers
Lasse
Your friendly neighbourhood flyslinger
Flycasting, so simple that instructors need to make it complicated since 1685
Got a Q++ at casting school, wearing shorts