PLEASE NOTE: In order to post on the Board you need to have registered. To register please email paul@sexyloops.com including your real name and username. Registration takes less than 24hrs, unless Paul is fishing deep in the jungle!

Line configuration affect on rod

Moderators: Paul Arden, stesiik

User avatar
gordonjudd
Posts: 1860
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:36 pm
Answers: 0
Location: Southern California

Re: Line configuration affect on rod

#61

Post by gordonjudd »

then W1 =1/2 F*x1 and W2=1/2 F*x2.
Merlin,
It is probably a typo of some sort but I get x1=F/k1 and x2=F/k2. Thus W1=1/2*k1*(F/k1).^2 and W2=1/2*k2*(F/k2).^2. Consequently W1=\(1/2*F^2/k1\) and W2=\(1/2*F^2/k2\) .

Result remains the same, i.e. W2>W1.
However a key parameter is the “loaded” speed of the rod and that involves rod action somewhere. Faster rods are more on the tip action side and can remain faster under load by comparison to softer / butt action rods. This influences tip speed.
Agreed. I suspect the faster unloading of the higher frequency rod is the primary reason it produces more tip speed.

Gordy
Stoatstail50
Posts: 1525
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:57 am
Answers: 0

Re: Line configuration affect on rod

#62

Post by Stoatstail50 »

My adjustments are based on the way my loops look.
Mine too. :)
Casting Definitions

Many men go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after.
George C
Posts: 359
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2018 7:30 am
Answers: 0

Re: Line configuration affect on rod

#63

Post by George C »

Thank you, Merlin.
I appreciate your patience and insight.
George
Torsten
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:34 pm
Answers: 0

Re: Line configuration affect on rod

#64

Post by Torsten »

Hi Paul,

Merlin/Gordy were faster, alternatively you can derive it this way:

PE= 1/2 * k * x^2 combined with
Fs = -k * x (Hooke's Law)

-> x = - Fs / k
-> PE = 1/2 * Fs² / k

and this means if we assume Fs (the load) is constant

PE ~ 1 / k

PE is inverse proportional to k
Paul Arden wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:05 am Ah yes. Because PE= 1/2 k.x^2 ?
User avatar
Lasse Karlsson
Posts: 5801
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 9:40 pm
Answers: 0
Location: There, and back again
Contact:

Re: Line configuration affect on rod

#65

Post by Lasse Karlsson »

Vinny wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 1:41 pm I never thought so much thought went into this. My adjustments are based on the way my loops look. I really am a “simple man”😎

Mine too, but mostly just the look of my flyleg :blush:
Your friendly neighbourhood flyslinger

Flycasting, so simple that instructors need to make it complicated since 1685

Got a Q++ at casting school, wearing shorts ;)
User avatar
Merlin
Posts: 2113
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:12 pm
Answers: 0
Location: France

Re: Line configuration affect on rod

#66

Post by Merlin »

Gordy

The relationship is the same
W=1/2 F^^2 /k
W= 1/2 F F/k
W= 1/2 F x

Merlin
Fly rods are like women, they won't play if they're maltreated
Charles Ritz, A Flyfisher's Life
User avatar
Merlin
Posts: 2113
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:12 pm
Answers: 0
Location: France

Re: Line configuration affect on rod

#67

Post by Merlin »

Hi Paul

I guess the broomstick was short.
Comparisons are always arguable. Does an HT12 feels lighter than an HT6?

Merlin
Fly rods are like women, they won't play if they're maltreated
Charles Ritz, A Flyfisher's Life
User avatar
Paul Arden
Site Admin
Posts: 19678
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:20 am
Answers: 2
Location: Belum Rainforest
Contact:

Re: Line configuration affect on rod

#68

Post by Paul Arden »

Hi Merlin, if we take a 7WT line for example then yes.

Cheers, Paul
It's an exploration; bring a flyrod.

Flycasting Definitions
User avatar
Merlin
Posts: 2113
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:12 pm
Answers: 0
Location: France

Re: Line configuration affect on rod

#69

Post by Merlin »

Then can someone explain that, I just can’t

Merlin
Fly rods are like women, they won't play if they're maltreated
Charles Ritz, A Flyfisher's Life
User avatar
Paul Arden
Site Admin
Posts: 19678
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:20 am
Answers: 2
Location: Belum Rainforest
Contact:

Re: Line configuration affect on rod

#70

Post by Paul Arden »

I think Gordy explained it quite well a few years ago, that the softer rod allows us to put more force in (to a given arc). This in turn alters our feeling of weight. His calculations at the time were that a flexible rod compared to a broomstick allowed us to double the amount of force we can input.

It’s a very easy test to do. We know it’s also happening in the world at large, because many casters use heavier lines than the rod suggests, but they could equally use softer rods to get the same feeling of weight with a given line that they want or expect.

A six weight line on a two weight rod will feel very heavy. But put that line on a 12WT rod and it will feel very light. This is despite the 12WT rod being much heavier than the 2WT rod and the flyline being the same in both instances.

Cheers, Paul
It's an exploration; bring a flyrod.

Flycasting Definitions
Post Reply

Return to “Flycasting”