PLEASE NOTE: In order to post on the Board you need to have registered. To register please email paul@sexyloops.com including your real name and username. Registration takes less than 24hrs, unless Paul is fishing deep in the jungle!

OSD

Moderators: Paul Arden, stesiik

Vinny
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2023 12:17 pm
Answers: 0
Location: Placida Florida

OSD

#1

Post by Vinny »

Can one achieve 100+’ with OSD? Like, when you guys compete in distance tournaments is the dominant technique 170 or OSD?
Vinny
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2023 12:17 pm
Answers: 0
Location: Placida Florida

Re: OSD

#2

Post by Vinny »

I ask because I was practicing in a field when two guys approached me questioning me about the 170 technique.
User avatar
James9118
Posts: 1661
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:59 pm
Answers: 0
Location: N.Wales

Re: OSD

#3

Post by James9118 »

Vinny wrote: Mon Mar 18, 2024 8:02 pm Can one achieve 100+’ with OSD? Like, when you guys compete in distance tournaments is the dominant technique 170 or OSD?
Yes, with ease - it's perfectly possible to hit 120 or 130 plus with OSD. This gets to the question of when OSD turns into a '170' - I don't think I've seen a satisfactory answer to this question yet, certainly not one that nails the definition of what a '170' is.

Incidentally, my other half uses closed stance to cast 120 plus (on a good day).

James.
Vinny
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2023 12:17 pm
Answers: 0
Location: Placida Florida

Re: OSD

#4

Post by Vinny »

Thank you James.
User avatar
Paul Arden
Site Admin
Posts: 19660
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:20 am
Answers: 2
Location: Belum Rainforest
Contact:

Re: OSD

#5

Post by Paul Arden »

Yep. If I take the wind out the equation I found I topped out with the 5WT at 110-115’ with OSD and the 170 allowed me to pass 120’.

The numbers I think that matter here is carry. These were some of my carry numbers:

67’ carry closed stance weight front foot.
75’6 carry closed stance weight back foot
86’ open stance distance
93’6 170.

86’ is enough to get the head out at the top of the loop with the MED5 (just). So it’s still competitive. But if you have a strong tailwind your carry is going to suffer. That’s where the 170 comes into its own.

The 170 is by far the most dominant technique in the WCs.

(The “170” for me is “two back-to-back stopless delivery casts”)

Cheers, Paul
It's an exploration; bring a flyrod.

Flycasting Definitions
User avatar
James9118
Posts: 1661
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:59 pm
Answers: 0
Location: N.Wales

Re: OSD

#6

Post by James9118 »

Paul Arden wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:20 am
(The “170” for me is “two back-to-back stopless delivery casts”)

Cheers, Paul
Hi Paul,

That could also describe a beginner's 'windscreen washer' type casting stroke :D

James
User avatar
Paul Arden
Site Admin
Posts: 19660
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:20 am
Answers: 2
Location: Belum Rainforest
Contact:

Re: OSD

#7

Post by Paul Arden »

Funny, that’s one of my drills! :cool:
It's an exploration; bring a flyrod.

Flycasting Definitions
User avatar
James9118
Posts: 1661
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:59 pm
Answers: 0
Location: N.Wales

Re: OSD

#8

Post by James9118 »

No idea who this young lad is :D :D :D , but would this count as a '170' (note the closed stance)?:



Then you have the steppers - I'd say most currently deliver closed stance.

James
Rickard
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2022 1:06 pm
Answers: 0

Re: OSD

#9

Post by Rickard »

James9118 wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2024 8:07 am
Paul Arden wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:20 am
(The “170” for me is “two back-to-back stopless delivery casts”)

Cheers, Paul
Hi Paul,

That could also describe a beginner's 'windscreen washer' type casting stroke :D

James
User avatar
James9118
Posts: 1661
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:59 pm
Answers: 0
Location: N.Wales

Re: OSD

#10

Post by James9118 »

Hi Rickard,

That video is a perfect example of a top class caster showing the difference between a pull-back stop and a '170'. Unfortunately the issue comes with casters who aren't so elite knowing the difference between a '170' and just a wide stroke angle - the two are very different in my opinion. I've had a number of casters tell me they are using a '170' style and when I've seen them cast I've thought it was nothing of the kind.

James
Post Reply

Return to “Flycasting”