PLEASE NOTE: In order to post on the Board you need to have registered. To register please email paul@sexyloops.com including your real name and username. Registration takes less than 24hrs, unless Paul is fishing deep in the jungle!

Unproven

Commenting on the Sexyloops’ Front Page
User avatar
Paul Arden
Site Admin
Posts: 19672
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:20 am
Answers: 2
Location: Belum Rainforest
Contact:

Re: Unproven

#11

Post by Paul Arden »

Saltwater fish are generally less fussy. Clousers in various sizes, a crab pattern and a popper and you have most of it covered. The importance of fly pattern is definitely overrated. Putting the fly in the right place seems to be the most important thing, how it’s fished and presented. Whether the fly has two or three tails, a tag or no tag, tied with starling or soft hen hackle, really is of absolutely no consequence almost all of the time. How it swims is of course important.

In my experience the simpler and shaggier the fly the better.

Back to the topic, I don’t think anglers design flies, I think the fish do. By that I mean we tweak patterns over hundreds and sometimes thousands of fish. Those are the flies that work. It’s only when you’ve stopped tweaking them are they finished. I certainly have flies that I don’t think can be improved upon. But that doesn’t stop me trying :laugh:

But I do think most of it is bollocks. Same with some casting. As a friend of mine once said (many times in fact!) “there are anglers and there are danglers”. I’m still not sure which he thought I was :D

I’m going to produce some fly tying videos. I need to rebuild my other boxes and this will give it a second purpose. I’ll definitely tie some flies using socks.

Incidentally I’ve solved my snakehead popper hook up problems (I believe). I’ve moved from 1 to 1/0. Who would have thought that would have made the difference? Amazing how much work I’ve done to try to find the solution. I think it’s the heavier hook.

Cheers, Paul
It's an exploration; bring a flyrod.

Flycasting Definitions
Bendix
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2021 12:23 pm
Answers: 0
Location: Denmark

Re: Unproven

#12

Post by Bendix »

Hi again.

Thanks for all your replies, and great points. But I think it’s getting off track with my original point.

What I was trying to say was, that I’m tired of the approach where people tie a new and “innovative” fly, and then posting pictures and videos all over the internet, and claiming that it’s the best fly in the world, before the varnish has even dried up…
My point is, how about actually going out and catch a fish or two on the fly, and prove that it actually works, before singing its praises, and claiming that it’s the best invention since sliced bread. I don’t think that’s too much to ask…

Cheers
Bendix
User avatar
Paul Arden
Site Admin
Posts: 19672
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:20 am
Answers: 2
Location: Belum Rainforest
Contact:

Re: Unproven

#13

Post by Paul Arden »

That’s certainly very weird Bendix. Fortunately I don’t see those posts. Maybe they all want to be extraordinary fly tying geniuses :D
It's an exploration; bring a flyrod.

Flycasting Definitions
User avatar
whinging pom
Posts: 332
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2021 5:18 pm
Answers: 0
Location: Oundle uk

Re: Unproven

#14

Post by whinging pom »

Paul Arden wrote: Sat Apr 06, 2024 4:53 am That’s certainly very weird Bendix. Fortunately I don’t see those posts. Maybe they all want to be extraordinary fly tying geniuses :D
Even before 'on line' was the go to source for new knowledge . 4 or 5 Magazines like Fly fishing and Fly Tying, etc here in the UK, would have these hacks, desperate for monthly copy, and inventing new 'Killer' patterns based on 'COD' entymology and run a few pages explaining its worth and there incredible wisdom.

I saw one of the hacks getting a good public dressing down about the practice by Oliver Edwards at BFFI one year, it was delicous!

Its part of the bullshit that surrounds this industry , that leads beginers and inexperienced anglers down dark allies to dead ends and too dissapointment. and then subsequently perpetuate the myths to the next lot starting on the journey.

Sadly we cant shoot the perpertrators or go back to the 14c at smash the printing presses. ( wouldnt that be lovely) But we can have a whinge!
pom
The Duffer of the Brook !

Nothing is Impossible: :???: I do Nothing everyday .
User avatar
Paul Arden
Site Admin
Posts: 19672
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:20 am
Answers: 2
Location: Belum Rainforest
Contact:

Re: Unproven

#15

Post by Paul Arden »

My first fly box…
bewildering.jpeg
bewildering.jpeg (78.25 KiB) Viewed 150 times
There were 8 sides packed wall to wall :laugh:

My current fly box…
IMG_7747.jpeg
IMG_7747.jpeg (121.73 KiB) Viewed 150 times
Out of which I fish two flies (because there are two species of fish here :cool:)

Fly fishing is a process of elimination!!!

Cheers, Paul
It's an exploration; bring a flyrod.

Flycasting Definitions
Rickard
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2022 1:06 pm
Answers: 0

Re: Unproven

#16

Post by Rickard »

There exist som variation there.
Attachments
IMG_4245.jpeg
User avatar
Paul Arden
Site Admin
Posts: 19672
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:20 am
Answers: 2
Location: Belum Rainforest
Contact:

Re: Unproven

#17

Post by Paul Arden »

Very nice! The variations are interesting. I often think we go fishing to develop flies. Constantly tweaking and sharpening our “toolbox”.

But I sometimes wonder if our flytying is like our handwriting/art work. Certainly my flies look like something I’ve scrawled across the paper. Messy and often indecipherable. It happens to be what I think the fish want, but the irony is not lost on me. :laugh:

Cheers, Paul
It's an exploration; bring a flyrod.

Flycasting Definitions
User avatar
umm, Steve
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 11:19 pm
Answers: 0
Location: Western Sierras, California

Re: Unproven

#18

Post by umm, Steve »

I read Yvon Chouinard’s “Simple Fly Fishing”. It inspired me to trim my fly boxes dramatically. For over a year I’ve fished with 6 patterns tied only with non-synthetic materials. I’ve had some of the best success since, which I attribute to thinking more about HOW to fish rather than what to fish.

Bringing this thought home to Bendix’s point: fish care more about action than colors, styles, or entomological accuracy. Fishermen seem to care about flash and voodoo. So there’s a ready market in fishermen for new flies that will solve their problems, and of course willing tiers to reach that market.
User avatar
Paul Arden
Site Admin
Posts: 19672
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:20 am
Answers: 2
Location: Belum Rainforest
Contact:

Re: Unproven

#19

Post by Paul Arden »

Colour can be a trigger too. Mostly HOT colours are a bad idea. But sometimes they are a very good idea.
It's an exploration; bring a flyrod.

Flycasting Definitions
User avatar
Carol
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:28 pm
Answers: 0
Location: Kalispell, MT
Contact:

Re: Unproven

#20

Post by Carol »

Paul Arden wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:44 pm I’m going to produce some fly tying videos. ... I’ll definitely tie some flies using socks.
Cheers, Paul
I thought scenting flies was not kosher.
Carol
Because it's painful getting flies out of spruce trees.
Post Reply

Return to “FP Discussions”