PLEASE NOTE: In order to post on the Board you need to have registered. To register please email paul@sexyloops.com including your real name and username. Registration takes less than 24hrs, unless Paul is fishing deep in the jungle!
Analysing loop propagation
Moderator: Torsten
Re: Analysing loop propagation
Graeme
Many thanks in advance to give an answser to my post #21 about a vertical snap cast from the balcony, the line being vertical at start. Would you then consider it is a tranverse wave travelling along and horizontal (long virtual) line?
Merlin
Many thanks in advance to give an answser to my post #21 about a vertical snap cast from the balcony, the line being vertical at start. Would you then consider it is a tranverse wave travelling along and horizontal (long virtual) line?
Merlin
Fly rods are like women, they won't play if they're maltreated
Charles Ritz, A Flyfisher's Life
Charles Ritz, A Flyfisher's Life
Re: Analysing loop propagation
Perhaps you can answer my question before we go further, eh? (Which rod action is no longer a wave?)
FFi CCI
Re: Analysing loop propagation
So if you mean I raise the rod tip and lower it quickly to make a snap cast, does the wave move horizontally like the wave travels along this rope?
Yes, I'd say it does. So, after you have answered my question (I asked first!), what's your point?
FFi CCI
- Paul Arden
- Site Admin
- Posts: 19555
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:20 am
- Location: Belum Rainforest
- Contact:
Re: Analysing loop propagation
Hi Graeme,
I think quite a few people are happy to consider it a wave
But transverse wave doesn’t make sense to me either. Here is a definition of transverse wave
Cheers, Paul
I think quite a few people are happy to consider it a wave
But transverse wave doesn’t make sense to me either. Here is a definition of transverse wave
The loop wave is not at right angles to propagation but aligned in the same direction.transverse wave
a wave in which the medium vibrates at right angles to the direction of its propagation.
Cheers, Paul
- gordonjudd
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:36 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Analysing loop propagation
Graeme,when it's really only falling at a similar rate to the upward propagation of the wave
The problem with that argument is that initial +y velocity of the loop's launch will result in a linear increase in its height while gravity will produce a quadratic decrease.
Thus just as with cannon balls, the negative increase in the y velocity related to gravity will soon overtake the initial constant +y velocity of the loop's launch and cause the object to fall.
For the loop to maintain its height or rise there must be an upward force that is equal to the downward mg force of gravity.
Gordy
Re: Analysing loop propagation
So this looks like a snap cast.
No argument will ever convince you that the loop is not a "transverse" wave.
Merlin
I agree with Paul, so would you find the compromise of saying that a loop is a "wave" be acceptable Graeme?No argument will ever convince you that the loop is not a "transverse" wave.
Merlin
Fly rods are like women, they won't play if they're maltreated
Charles Ritz, A Flyfisher's Life
Charles Ritz, A Flyfisher's Life
Re: Analysing loop propagation
Apparently none of you want to answer the question I posed in post #19. That's sad.
What's the point of starting a thread called "Analysing loop propagation" if nobody actually wants to question their underlying assumptions? This is not analysis: this is just confirmation of old ideas.
From here:
In fact, very few of the long-time protagonists in this debate are "happy to call the loop a wave". I don't know what they want to call it, but they are so fixated on the fact that the medium is displaced at the end of the cast that it overpowers their consideration of the remaining features of a transverse wave.
For me, every bend that travels long the fly line is a transverse wave. I don't care if it's a tiny one from rod counter flex or a huge one from making a cast; the travelling bend is a wave. The question then becomes "what is the direction of propagation for that wave?" The answer to that lies in the definition you found Paul:
Cheers,
Graeme
That's exactly what I've been saying. That none of you want to consider direction of propagation to be vertical still has me perplexed even when I post a video of it happening.Paul wrote:But transverse wave doesn’t make sense to me either. Here is a definition of transverse wavetransverse wave
a wave in which the medium vibrates at right angles to the direction of its propagation.
What's the point of starting a thread called "Analysing loop propagation" if nobody actually wants to question their underlying assumptions? This is not analysis: this is just confirmation of old ideas.
Perhaps that's true, as long as they can make up a name for it that does not exist outside Sexyloops.Paul wrote:I think quite a few people are happy to consider it a wave
From here:
So, according to people here, since the loop is not a transverse wave, it's a longitudinal wave, right? I call that one BS. (I think everyone agrees it's not a longitudinal wave.)There are two types of mechanical waves:
- Longitudinal waves – In this type of wave, the movement of the particle are parallel to the motion of the energy i.e. the displacement of the medium is in the same direction to which the wave is moving. Example – Sound Waves, Pressure Waves.
- Transverse waves – When the movement of the particles is at right angles or perpendicular to the motion of the energy, then this type of wave is known as Transverse wave.
In fact, very few of the long-time protagonists in this debate are "happy to call the loop a wave". I don't know what they want to call it, but they are so fixated on the fact that the medium is displaced at the end of the cast that it overpowers their consideration of the remaining features of a transverse wave.
For me, every bend that travels long the fly line is a transverse wave. I don't care if it's a tiny one from rod counter flex or a huge one from making a cast; the travelling bend is a wave. The question then becomes "what is the direction of propagation for that wave?" The answer to that lies in the definition you found Paul:
The medium is vibrating horizontally and a right angle to that is the vertical.a wave in which the medium vibrates at right angles to the direction of its propagation.
Cheers,
Graeme
FFi CCI
Re: Analysing loop propagation
What sort of mechanical wave do you want it to be Merlin? Longitudinal or transverse?
Or are we going to follow Sexyloops tradition and make up something new that only applies to the physics of casting?
(And you STILL haven't answered my question from post #19, have you? Typical. )
Cheers,
Graeme
FFi CCI
Re: Analysing loop propagation
The problem with this argument is that we are talking about a wave travelling through a falling medium in which the tension is variable and therefore the wave velocity is not constant.gordonjudd wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 3:44 pmGraeme,when it's really only falling at a similar rate to the upward propagation of the wave
The problem with that argument is that initial +y velocity of the loop's launch will result in a linear increase in its height while gravity will produce a quadratic decrease.
Cheers,
Graeme
FFi CCI
- Paul Arden
- Site Admin
- Posts: 19555
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:20 am
- Location: Belum Rainforest
- Contact:
Re: Analysing loop propagation
So in a flu cast the wave is travelling upwards?
I have to spend some time thinking about that. I think I may be shifting more towards James’ view
Back later.
Cheers, Paul
I have to spend some time thinking about that. I think I may be shifting more towards James’ view
Back later.
Cheers, Paul