I didn't mean, that you did that. I knew you didn't...Paul Arden wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 3:50 pm I don’t think Paul defined a tailing loop as one or two intersections...
What I meant is, that few of us have moved on. Those few (I am one of them) have no more need (or want to spend much time) in running into the same old trap again and again.
Everyone who has been into teaching a lot, not just 50 first students, will know, that there are many different shapes of tailing loops entering the lessons. Yet they are all caused by pretty few different causes, easy to be identified once you have learnt them all. Studying videos does help a lot here.
Violating the 180 concept is not among these causes.
Violating the 180 concept on purpose, but not matching to keep acceleration smooth enough (and causing a too sudden increase in rod bend) of course easily leads into a tailing loop. But it was failing in the art of acceleration only to cause the tailing loop...
Oh, and I believe the reason I don't see a tailing loop in Aitors video is because there was none! Thus you are wrong, if you claim violating 180 causes tailing loops.
Now let's assume you could prove that adding a) not having a well unrolled (of course not STRAIGHT) line at the start of the fc* and b) violating the 180 concept such extremely like Aitor did would cause a tailing loop, it still would not be violating the 180 concept causing the tailing.
*You may for example start from a half way unrolled line of course...
Cheers
B